How AI and Related Technologies Are Changing Military and Warfare

Helene Pleil, Niklas Schörnig and Özlem Alev Demirel on the panel

Panel discussion with Özlem Alev Demirel, Helene Pleil and Dr. Niklas Schörnig

Arti­ficial intelli­gence (AI) and other new techno­logies are be­coming a key factor in modern war­fare in the military sphere, as is already evident in Ukraine, for example. The third chapter of the recently pub­lished Peace Report (in German) — which is issued an­nually by the four German peace and conflict research insti­tutes PRIF, bicc, INEF, and IFSH — is de­voted to this topic. To mark the occa­sion, PRIF, the Frank­furter Rund­schau, and the Ca­tholic Aca­demy Rabanus Maurus hosted a panel dis­cussion at the Haus am Dom in Frank­furt on June 11. The panel included Özlem Alev Demirel, a politician from the Left Party and Member of the Euro­pean Parlia­ment, Helene Pleil, Senior Policy Re­searcher on Cyber­security and Emer­ging Threats at the think tank inter­face, and Niklas Schörnig, Senior Re­searcher at PRIF and Head of the “Emer­ging Dis­ruptive Techno­logies” research group, which is part of the joint project CNTR. Andreas Schwarz­kopf, head of the Opinion section at the Frank­furter Rund­schau, moderated the panel dis­cussion.

At the outset, the panelists explained the extent to which AI is used in the military and in warfare. For instance, it not only opti­mizes training within the Bundes­wehr but is also employed to support espionage and dis­information opera­tions. In addition, it plays a role in active combat operations, particularly in target selection and decision-making. Pleil illustrated the tension: On the one hand, AI can provide security by helping to address vulnera­bilities in one’s own defense; on the other hand, it creates new un­certainties and dangers for the civilian popu­lation, as adver­saries also use AI tools. In on­going wars, for example, there is a high number of civilian casual­ties.

The panelists agreed on the dangers posed by AI techno­logies: the accele­rated pace resulting from the use of AI is dangerous. Schörnig explained that, especially in conflicts, it is impor­tant to take the time to re­consider the next steps. Since AI greatly ac­celerates pro­cesses, there is less time for diplo­macy. In addition, both Pleil and Demirel drew atten­tion to the global asym­metry in AI usage. While eco­nomically power­ful states have access to new techno­logies, poorer countries find them­selves at a dis­advantage. 

This led to the final sub­topic of the dis­cussion: How can the risks posed by new techno­logies be miti­gated? The panelists agreed that a volun­tary commit­ment by nations to the res­ponsible use of AI could be more effective than attempting global regu­lation. How­ever, control and dis­armament treaties based on mutual trust and dia­logue would be neces­sary for more peace­ful co­existence.

To watch the re­cording of the panel dis­cussion on You­Tube: Neue Techno­logien, neue Reali­täten der Sicher­heit? (in German)

To the PRIF talk with Niklas Schörnig: KI, Krieg und Kontrolle (in German)