Between Independence and Interference: The G20 Engagement Groups as Arenas of Legitimation Discourse

Five people stand in a row and smile at the camera, including Nicole Deitelhoff, Diane Schumann and Jonas Wolff. Dina Schumann stands in the middle, holding a decorated doctor's hat and a school cone.

Diane Schumann has successfully defended her dissertation

On February 19, Diane Schumann, former Docto­ral Researcher in the Research Depart­ment Inter­national Insti­tutions, success­fully defended her dissertation entitled „Between Inde­pendence and Inter­ference: The G20 Engagement Groups as Arenas of Legiti­mation Dis­course“.

The disser­tation exa­mines how dia­logue forums of global eco­nomic and financial insti­tutions shape civil society actors' legiti­macy beliefs, using the G20’s Civil 20 Engage­ment Groups as case study. These Engage­ment Groups pro­vide a plat­form for diverse global non-state actors to engage with the G20, cons­tantly navi­gating the tension be­tween gaining indepen­dence and agency on the one side, and being con­trolled, restricted, or even silenced by the presi­ding country on the other side. The study finds that while G20 dia­logue forums create critical spaces for discourse, they are neither effective tools for streng­thening legitimacy nor for sup­pressing criticism. In an era of shrin­king civic spaces world­wide, these forums remain an essen­tial arena for ex­change and in­fluence.

We con­gratulate Diane on her success­ful dissertation!